By Andrea Germanos/Common Dreams
Intensified airstrikes by the U.S.-led coalition targeting the Islamic State are responsible for a “staggering loss of civilian life” in Raqqa, Syria, a United Nations investigator says.
The northern Syrian city, the so-called capital of the Islamic State (ISIS), is where U.S.-backed forces, including Syrian Kurdish and Arab U.S.-backed rebel groups, have begun an offensive. That effort to retake the city from ISIS, also referred to as ISIL, was aided by U.S.-led coalition airstrikes.
But these increased strikes were in the crosshairs of Paulo Pinheiro, the chairman of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry for Syria, who gave the U.N. Human Rights Council his dire assessment of the situation for Syrian civilians, who “are in the unenviable role of being the target of most warring parties” and face “disastrous consequences.”
Photo: EPA
While Pinheiro told the U.N. body that a successful offensive “could liberate the city’s civilian population from the group’s oppressive clutches, including Yazidi women and girls, whom the group has kept sexually enslaved for almost three years as part of an ongoing and unaddressed genocide,” he underscored that the “imperative to fight terrorism must not [ . . . ] be undertaken at the expense of civilians who unwillingly find themselves living in areas where ISIL is present.”
He said that the “that the intensification of airstrikes” as a result of the offensive “has resulted not only in staggering loss of civilian life, but has also led to 160,000 civilians fleeing their homes and becoming internally displaced.”
Those fleeing Raqqa, and countless others forced to join the ranks of internally displaced people across Syria, face “a wretched experience” and “are particularly vulnerable to violence,” Pinheiro said. He also pointed to “aerial bombardments by pro-Government forces” and other forced evacuations that leave civilians in peril.
According to Reuters:
[T]he U.S. delegation [to the Human Rights Council] made no reference to Raqqa or the air strikes. U.S. diplomat Jason Mack called the Syrian government “the primary perpetrator” of egregious human rights violations in the country.
U.S.-led coalition airstrikes killing Syrian civilians is not new.
Chris Woods, director of monitoring group Airwars, told The Intercept that “We have been killing a lot of civilians in and around Raqqa for quite some time now, yet these incidents are rarely admitted by the coalition and there is almost no interest from international media.”
A free and independent press is essential to the health of a functioning democracy
Echoing Pinheiro, U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein said this month, “Just because ISIS holds an area does not mean less care can be taken.” He added: “Civilians should always be protected, whether they are in areas controlled by ISIS or by any other party.”
Human Rights Watch also denounced in a statement the reported use of white phosphorus munitions by the coalition in Raqqa as well as Mosul, Iraq.
“No matter how white phosphorus is used, it poses a high risk of horrific and long-lasting harm in crowded cities like Raqqa and Mosul and any other areas with concentrations of civilians,” said Steve Goose, arms director at the human rights organization. “U.S.-led forces should take all feasible precautions to minimize civilian harm when using white phosphorus in Iraq and Syria,” he said.
Pinheiro said in his address: “the only way to end civilian suffering is to end this war.”
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Comments welcome.
Posted on June 20, 2017