By Steve Rhodes
We are seeing in the coverage of the decision by the Chicago Teachers Union’s House of Delegates to take the city’s latest contract offer back to the rank-and-file so they can actually read it carefully and provide input the importance of the media’s ability to recognize political framing and reject it in favor of independent reporting instead of becoming the toadies of those in power who spend a lot of money on consultants to create such narrative devices.
As it did earlier in the negotiations when it falsely claimed an agreement was near, the city created a sense that the contract was a done deal but for dotting i’s and crossing t’s, as the media dutifully reported. The effect is to make the CTU look like it is now stubbornly stalling or, as the Tribune argues, holding out for an even “sweeter deal.”
The Tribune fails badly in reading and listening comprehension. They begin their editorial today this way:
On Friday, Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis sounded ebullient when she announced that the union had reached a tentative deal with Chicago Public Schools officials. The union leader, hailed by some as a national labor hero, said she was “very comfortable” with the terms. “We think it’s a framework that will get us to an agreement.”
Memo to the Trib: A “framework that will get us to an agreement” is not the same thing as an agreement.
Read More
Posted on September 17, 2012