By Steve Rhodes
1. Both papers put the alleged plot to attack the Sears Tower across the top of their front pages this morning. The Sun-Times‘s headline “Sears Tower Terror Plot” appeared in red. The Tribune‘s “FBI: Sears Tower Targeted” appeared in traditional Tribune black, but somehow appeared more ominous than usual. The Tribune has a special way of doing that.
But there sure seems like there’s less than meets the eye here. “[A] source said the alleged cell was not close to carrying out any attack,” the Sun-Times reported. “Another source . . . said the suspects had only devised a plot on paper.”
Hey, look, I don’t want to underestimate the motivations of those arrested, but I have friends who have devised plots on paper, possibly even involving the Sears Tower.
The Sun-Times article concludes with a Sears Tower executive saying that “despite new information, law enforcement continues to tell us that they have never found evidence of a credible terrorism threat against Sears Tower that has gone beyond criminal discussions.”
Likewise, the Tribune, which gave the top half of its front page to the story by including a large photo of three armed FBI agents standing around doing nothing, says in its second paragaph that “The suspects had ‘aspirations’ but ‘no means’ to attack the Sears Tower or other buildings, a senior federal law-enforcement source said.”
And then, a few paragraphs later: “‘There was no threat at all,’ the senior federal law-enforcement source said, referring to the Sears Tower.”
Then why am I reading about this on the front page?
Still, the Tribune found it useful to work up an “Inside America’s Tallest Building” graphic to go with the story. (I guess “Inside America’s Tallest Building Which Was Under No Plausible Threat” didn’t fit in the allotted space.)
This is not an uninteresting or unworthy story. It’s just not as worthy – yet, anyway – as Chicago’s newspaper editors seem to think. The story originated out of Miami. The Miami Herald headline? “Terrorism Raid Targets A Warehouse In Miami.” (You can see how it looks via the Herald link on the left rail of NewsDesigner.com.)
In the meantime, the Tribune says, “Chicago police said the city is not on increased alert despite the news.”
Chicago’s newspapers are, though. Despite the news.
2. “There’s no excuse for his choice of words,” White Sox chairman Jerry Reinsdorf said in a radio interview Thursday about manager Ozzie Guillen calling Sun-Times columnist Jay Mariotti “a piece of shit” and “a fucking fag.”
“You have to separate that from the issue of the person he is talking about because that person is, indeed, a piece of garbage,” Reinsdorf added, according to a Sun-Times account, which curiously lacked responses from the paper’s sports editor Stu Courtney and editor-in-chief John Barron.
3. Meanwhile, Ozzie continues to alienate heterosexuals too . . .
Read More
Posted on June 23, 2006