By Steve Rhodes
The embarrassing folly that is the Sun-Times‘s coverage of the city’s 2016 Olympics bid continued over the weekend with a front-page story billed as an “Exclusive First Look” at the proposed Olympic Village that wasn’t much of a look at anything at all – “more an idea than a real design at this point,” said Skidmore, Owings & Merrill managing partner Tom Kerwin, who is also an advisor to the city’s Olympic committee.
The rest of the story – I know, shocking for the Sun-Times – was impossible to differentiate from a press release. This unquestioned spin point in particular caught my attention: “The [Washington Park] stadium would have 15,000 more seats than an earlier Olympic arena concept for downtown, in part because it’s now anticipated that the excitement of the Chicago Games would create ‘an extraordinary appetite for tickets,’ [advisor Doug] Arnot said.”
Right. Under the previous proposal, city officials did not anticipate such an appetite for tickets. The change has nothing to do with the fact that the previous proposal was untenable; how could it have been, the Sun-Times must be thinking, when we “reported” how great that plan was too?
Posted on September 25, 2006