By Steve Rhodes
Well, I guess the article I reported for Chicago magazine on the city council is out, though not yet on their website, so no link yet.
[UPDATE: Link here.]
Here’s the truth: I was quite disappointed the piece was repositioned at the end of editing into what I view as a garden-variety city council rubber stamp story; the assignment, reporting and original drafts were focused on how Rahm specifically has dealt with the council, with him as the protaganist in a driving narrative that opened with his own campaign promises of change and closed with the genuflecting of aldermen to Dear Leader at the last council meeting of 2012. Hope folks like it, and the early feedback is good, but the final edit made me queasy. Also lost about a thousand words at the end due to, I guess, slow ad sales. But a full page of art!
But this post isn’t to criticize Chicago magazine, for which I’m grateful for the assignment (and the money). They know my views. It’s their call [UPDATE: Nah, I’m pissed. They suck.] It’s to introduce that story to readers as a way to segue into the brazen and bizarre creation this week of a second “progressive” caucus on the council. Normally, this might be news to cheer, seeing as how “progressive” in relation to the council is as much about being “independent” and not in the mayor’s pocket as it is about a left-liberal ideology. In this case, it’s depressing as hell.
Read More
Posted on March 14, 2013