By Mike Luce
As viewers and fans of an inherently violent game, at what point are we morally obligated to object, to stop watching, to stop buying merchandise and to demand that the officials (administrators, coaches, athletic directors) make changes to the game to protect the players?
While not always stated as directly, the damage done by playing football on players has been the topic of discussion for several weeks. For example, Michael Sokolove authored an opinion piece for the New York Times’ “Week In Review” section (from Sunday, October 24) titled “Should You Watch Football?” about the quandary of watching – and being entertained by – a game “whose level of violence is demonstrably destructive”. (Sokolove’s opinion seems to be “it depends”.)
Much of the hand-wringing results from a weekend of nasty injuries in college and pro football. Last Saturday, Rutgers University defensive tackle Eric LeGrand suffered a traumatic spinal cord injury during a kickoff return against Army. As of this writing, LeGrand remains paralyzed.
Posted on October 29, 2010